ReviewGut and liver2026
Translating Gut Microbiota into Diagnostics: A Multidimensional Approach for the Diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
Review in Gut and liver, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Role of Microbiota and Fecal Transplantation in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The gut microbiota has emerged as a key factor in the pathophysiology of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), providing novel opportunities for diagnostic innovation. Traditional biomarkers, such as C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin, are widely used in clinical practice; however, their ability to reflect disease complexity and microbial dysregulation remains limited. Recent advances in metagenomics and multi-omics integration have enabled high-resolution profiling of microbial communities and their functional capacities and associated metabolites. Differential abundance analysis and machine learning models have been used to identify microbial biomarkers that can distinguish patients with IBD from healthy individuals. Multicohort studies integrating microbiome and metabolomic data have further improved diagnostic accuracy and generalizability. Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses provide complementary insights into host-microbe interactions and disease mechanisms. In this review, we explored the potential of metagenomic biodata as diagnostic markers for IBD, with an emphasis on a multidimensional analytical approach. We highlight the recent developments in sequencing technologies, computational pipelines for microbial feature selection, and machine learning strategies applied to biomarker discovery. The integration of multi-omics data deepens our understanding of host-microbe interactions and facilitates the development of microbiota-informed diagnostic tools. As multidimensional microbial profiling evolves, its clinical utility for the diagnosis and stratification of IBD requires further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.