ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025
Scientometric analysis of publications in Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma since its inception.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study evaluates the publication output of the journal of clinical orthopedic and trauma (JCOT) in from 2010 to 2025 using bibliometric methods. Methods: The publications as listed in the Scopus database were identified using, "Article" as document type to maintain the homogeneity and consistency in the present review. The study used Excel sheet for data cleaning and primary calculation. The present study used multiple tools such as Biblioshiny, PyBibx and VOS Viewer software for further statistical analysis and visualization. Results: More than half of the publications were contributed by Indian authors followed by UK, USA and Italy respectively. There is trend for multi and mega authorship. AIIMS, New Delhi and Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals lead the nations' baton for publication, while the Royal Orthopedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (UK) and Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (USA) were international representation. The citations are highest for the year 2020 followed by 2021 and 2019 respectively. There is mostly domestic collaboration with Germany having maximum internation collaboration. "fractures", "neglected" "total knee arthroplasty", "total hip arthroplasty" and "COVID" emerged dominant keywords and co-occurrence. There is steady growth in social platforms as seen in altmetrics. Conclusion: JCOT has been predominantly influenced by substantial contributions from Indian authors; however, there is a recent trend towards multi- and mega-authorship. International collaboration with funding organisations and institutions is establishing a global presence. The journal disseminates extensive research on trauma, fractures, and arthroplasties, encompassing the entirety of orthopaedics and thereby enlightening its readership on contemporary orthopaedic standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.