Evidence mapPaperPMID 41220559Full record

ArticleJMA journal2025

Comparative Analysis of the Oral Frailty Five-item Checklist and Oral Frailty Index-8 Tools in Assessing Oral Frailty and Their Association with Systemic Health Indicators.

Hiroshi Kusunoki, Shotaro Tsuji, Kazumi Ekawa, Nozomi Kato, Keita Yamasaki, Fumiki Yoshihara, Hideo Shimizu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMA journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hiroshi KusunokiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Osaka Dental University, Hirakata, Japan.
Shotaro TsujiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Osaka Dental University, Hirakata, Japan.
Kazumi EkawaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Osaka Dental University, Hirakata, Japan.
Nozomi KatoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Osaka Dental University, Hirakata, Japan.
Keita YamasakiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Osaka Dental University, Hirakata, Japan.
Fumiki YoshiharaDepartment of Hypertension and Nephrology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.
Hideo ShimizuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Osaka Dental University, Hirakata, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Oral frailty, defined as an age-related decline in oral function, represents a significant risk factor for adverse health outcomes, though it can be mitigated through early intervention. The Oral Frailty Five-item Checklist (OF-5), introduced in 2023, assesses oral frailty using 5 indicators: reduced number of teeth, difficulty chewing, difficulty swallowing, dry mouth, and low articulatory oral motor skills. Designed for use beyond dental clinics, the OF-5 has demonstrated predictive validity for physical frailty and mortality. Similarly, the Oral Frailty Index-8 (OFI-8) comprises 8 items evaluating oral health, social participation, and dental habits. Methods: This study compared the OF-5 and OFI-8 tools and investigated their associations with physical and biological markers. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on 270 Japanese participants aged ≥65 years (median age: 78 years). The assessments included blood tests, physical measurements, and grip strength evaluation. Participants were categorized by sex and oral frailty risk based on OF-5 scores (non-frailty: ≤1; frailty: ≥2). Results: Oral frailty, defined as an OF-5 score ≥2, was observed in 40.7% of the participants (33.8% in men and 47.4% in women). Both the OF-5 and OFI-8 scores were higher in women than in men. Sex-specific differences in physical and biological markers were evident; men exhibited higher grip strength, whereas women had a higher prevalence of anemia and osteoporosis. Women were also more likely to report reduced masticatory ability and lower levels of social participation. A high concordance rate of over 80% was observed between oral frailty (OF-5 score ≥2) and high-risk oral frailty (OFI-8 score ≥4). Conclusions: These findings highlight the utility of subjective questionnaires in assessing oral frailty and emphasize the need for longitudinal studies to evaluate their predictive accuracy for physical frailty.

Indexed as

frailtyoral frailtyOral Frailty Five-item Checklist (OF-5)Oral Frailty Index-8 (OFI-8)

Identifiers

PMID41220559
PMCPMC12598202

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.