ArticleInternational journal of women's health2025
A Predictive Model Based on Machine Learning Algorithm for Vein Thrombosis After Ovarian Cancer Resection.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the most fatal complication of ovarian cancer and adversely affects prognosis. This study aimed to develop and validate predictive models for VTE risk following ovarian cancer resection using machine learning (ML) techniques and incorporating perioperative clinical and surgical variables. Methods: Retrospective data were collected from 931 patients with ovarian cancer who underwent resection between March 2018 and April 2024 at two tertiary hospitals. The Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression was employed to identify critical predictors of VTE and seven ML models, including Logistic Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), Extreme Gradient Boosting Machine (XGBoost), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naïve Bayes (NB), and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM) were trained and optimized. Optimal hyperparameters were selected based on a 10-fold cross-validation. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), precision-recall area under the curve (PR-AUC), balanced accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and Brier score. The SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) package was used to interpret the optimal models. Results: The incidence of postoperative VTE was 10.0% (93/931). Among the models, XGBoost demonstrated superior performance, achieving an AUC of 0.935 (95% CI: 0.902-0.963) and PR-AUC of 0.620 (95% CI: 0.457-0.809), recall of 0.849, F1 score of 0.571, and Brier score of 0.116. SHAP analysis identified residual disease, surgical duration, postoperative D-dimer levels, postoperative chemotherapy, and age as the top five contributors to postoperative VTE risk. Conclusion: The ML-based model, particularly the XGBoost algorithm, effectively predicted the VTE risk in patients with post-resection ovarian cancer. This tool may assist clinicians in early identification of high-risk individuals, thereby enabling personalized thromboprophylaxis and optimizing perioperative management to mitigate VTE-related morbidities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.