Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41220697›Full record

ArticleSurgical neurology international2025

What factors contribute to delays in first versus non-first case operating room starts for patients undergoing elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?

Sean Inzerillo, Pemla Jagtiani, Salazar Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sean InzerilloCollege of Medicine, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, United States.
Pemla JagtianiCollege of Medicine, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, United States.
Salazar JonesDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Hospital System, New York, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common spine procedure with standardized steps, making it well-suited for examining inefficiencies in the operating room (OR). This study evaluated the causes and durations of surgical delays in elective ACDFs at a single academic center, focusing on differences between first and non-first case starts. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 385 elective ACDF procedures performed from 2021 to 2022. Surgical delays were defined as cases that started more than 10 min late. Delay causes were extracted from OR records and categorized into operational themes. First versus non-first case starts were compared using descriptive statistics, Chi-square testing, and Welch's Results: Surgical delays occurred in 48.8% of cases, most commonly due to prior case delays (46.3%, mean delay 121.9 min) and preoperative team coordination issues (25.5%, mean delay 43.1 min). First case starts experienced significantly fewer delays (24.2%) than non-first case starts (85.7%, Conclusions: This study underscores a clear first case advantage in elective ACDFs, with earlier starts experiencing fewer and shorter delays. Targeted measures including preoperative planning, turnover optimization, and surgeon engagement may enhance OR efficiency.

Indexed as

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusionOR efficiencySpine surgerySurgeon burnoutSurgical delays

Identifiers

PMID41220697
PMCPMC12598595

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.