ArticleSurgical neurology international2025
What factors contribute to delays in first versus non-first case operating room starts for patients undergoing elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common spine procedure with standardized steps, making it well-suited for examining inefficiencies in the operating room (OR). This study evaluated the causes and durations of surgical delays in elective ACDFs at a single academic center, focusing on differences between first and non-first case starts. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 385 elective ACDF procedures performed from 2021 to 2022. Surgical delays were defined as cases that started more than 10 min late. Delay causes were extracted from OR records and categorized into operational themes. First versus non-first case starts were compared using descriptive statistics, Chi-square testing, and Welch's Results: Surgical delays occurred in 48.8% of cases, most commonly due to prior case delays (46.3%, mean delay 121.9 min) and preoperative team coordination issues (25.5%, mean delay 43.1 min). First case starts experienced significantly fewer delays (24.2%) than non-first case starts (85.7%, Conclusions: This study underscores a clear first case advantage in elective ACDFs, with earlier starts experiencing fewer and shorter delays. Targeted measures including preoperative planning, turnover optimization, and surgeon engagement may enhance OR efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.