ArticleJDS communications2025
Impact of animal and herd factors on the nonenzymatic antioxidant potential in milk from individual Brown Swiss cows.
Article in JDS communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to (1) characterize the nonenzymatic antioxidant activity of individual bovine milk samples using 2 assays: ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), and (2) investigate the effects of animal (DIM, parity, and daily milk yield [DMY; kg/d]) and environmental factors (temperature-humidity index [THI], season, ventilation, feeding, and altitude) on these traits. Milk samples were collected once during evening milking from 1,060 Brown Swiss cows across 53 herds in Northern Italy. Antioxidant activity was expressed as micromolar ascorbic acid equivalents per milliliter of milk for the FRAP and as a percentage of DPPH inhibition. Both traits in milk were influenced by a range of animal-related and environmental factors, with varying degrees of impact. The FRAP values were highest in primiparous cows and decreased with increasing parity. In contrast, DPPH inhibition was greatest in tertiparous cows, followed by primiparous and secondiparous cows. Days in milk had a significant effect on DPPH, which declined as lactation progressed. A positive association was observed between DMY and FRAP values, with FRAP increasing up to approximately 25 kg/d, beyond which it plateaued. Among the environmental factors, the lowest FRAP values were observed in summer and in herds fed a dry TMR. Furthermore, milk from herds equipped with ventilation systems showed slightly higher DPPH inhibition compared with those without such systems. These findings offer valuable insights into factors affecting antioxidant properties in bovine milk and underscore the need for further research into other nonenzymatic antioxidants and their concentrations. Future studies should investigate the genetic basis of milk antioxidant properties, examine their relationship with milk composition, and evaluate the consequences for animal health and product quality.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.