ArticleMolecular biology reports2025
Detection of bacteria affected by roasted burdock tea powder and fructooligosaccharide in human faecal culture.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBurdock root is rich in gut fermentable fructan (inulin). This study aimed to clarify the effects of processed foods containing burdock on the gut microbiota by inoculating faecal slurries into cultures containing roasted burdock tea powder. METHODS AND
resultsHuman faecal slurries (n = 5) were inoculated into cultures containing 4% (w/v) roasted burdock tea powder that washed with 85% (v/v) ethanol (WBT), 0.4% fructooligosaccharide (FO), or both WBT and FO (BF). After 24 h of anaerobic incubation, lactate and acetate levels significantly increased in the BF and WBT cultures. Putrefactive compounds, such as ammonia and indole, were suppressed in BF and WBT cultures. Analysis of 16S rDNA (V3-V4 region) amplicon sequencing revealed that WBT increased the abundance of Bifidobacterium and Faecalibacterium spp. more than twofold; however, the effect varied among individuals. The amplicon sequences were used to predict metabolic functions using Tax4Fun and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes database. Histidine biosynthesis was suggested to be promoted in WBT cultures.
conclusionThis in vitro study provides novel insights into the gut microbiota, typical WBT-responsible gut indigenous bacteria, such as Bifidobacterium and Faecalibacterium spp., and fermentable dietary fibre. Overall, these findings show the potential applications of burdock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41222584What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.