SynthesisInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2026
Effectiveness of ketamine/esketamine in alleviating postoperative fatigue: a systematic review.
Synthesis in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPostoperative fatigue (POF) is a clinically significant complication. Numerous studies have found that ketamine and esketamine show potential in alleviating POF. However, there is currently no systematic evidence to assess its exact effectiveness.
aimThis study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of perioperative ketamine/esketamine in alleviating POF in surgical patients.
methodA systematic review was reported following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. The study protocol was prospectively registered in the PROSPERO Registry (CRD420251060988). We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from inception to May 31, 2025, using a combination of MeSH terms and free-text keywords related to "ketamine", "esketamine", "surgery", "anaesthesia" and "fatigue". Eligible studies were prospective or retrospective clinical studies comparing ketamine/esketamine with control in surgical patients, reporting fatigue-related outcomes. Two reviewers independently screened studies, another two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. A narrative synthesis was performed due to clinical and methodological heterogeneity.
resultsIn total, 556 studies were identified. Nine studies (n = 1606) were included in this review, among which seven were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two were observational studies. Four RCTs had low risk of bias, while the remaining three had some concerns. The two cohort studies were of moderate quality. The included studies encompassed various surgical procedures: colorectal cancer resection (n = 2), gastric surgery (n = 1), hysterectomy (n = 1), breast surgery (n = 2), orthopedic surgery (n = 1), and gastrointestinal endoscopy (n = 2). The outcomes varied according to the type of surgery. In studies of major abdominal surgeries, ketamine/esketamine has demonstrated certain potential in improving POF, but the certainty of evidence was graded as low. In contrast, no significant benefits were observed in breast or orthopedic surgeries. In the two studies on gastrointestinal endoscopy, the results were inconsistent.
conclusionCurrent evidence suggests that ketamine/esketamine may be effective in alleviating POF, particularly in major abdominal surgeries. These findings should be interpreted cautiously due to the heterogeneity in study designs, variations in fatigue assessment tools and time, and the limited sample sizes of the included studies. Future high-quality RCTs are needed to confirm these observations and establish the optimal dosing regimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.