ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Enhanced Prediction of Cardiac Risk in Neonates Using Calibrated Ensemble Learning Approaches.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study proposes a Heterogeneous Hybrid Machine Learning Model (HHMM) for the early detection of cardiac arrest in newborns in intensive care. The model combines three classifiers through stacking: XGBoost (XGB), Random Forest (RF), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), where their probability outputs serve as meta-features. The Random Forest classifier acts as a meta-learner, aggregating predictions for the final classification. The weighted stacking method assigns performance-based weights to the base classifiers by combining their probabilities using weighted averaging. The HHMM was trained and tested using clinical cardiovascular risk data. The model performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC-ROC metrics. The results showed that HHMM outperformed the individual classifiers and conventional ensembles, achieving 95% accuracy, 96% precision, 94% recall, and 95% AUC-ROC. The HHMM's performance stems from its ability to capture complex patterns, reduce overfitting, and enhance generalization. The interpretability of the model through probability calibration makes it suitable for use in clinical decision-support systems. This study advances cardiac risk prediction in neonates using calibrated ensemble learning and stacking, thereby providing a foundation for real-time monitoring systems to improve patient outcomes in neonatal-care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41222642What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.