ReviewArchives of microbiology2025
Exploring the microbial basis of postbiotic and paraprobiotic therapy in ulcerative colitis.
Review in Archives of microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current Understanding of Probiotic Strains and Immune Function: From Gut Microbiota to Systemic Immunity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Preventive Effects of Probiotic and PostbioticJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Dual-pathway mechanisms of plant-derived polysaccharides in ulcerative colitis: integrative roles of microbiota modulation, immune regulation, and barrier restoration.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease characterized by disrupted mucosal integrity and immune dysregulation. Emerging evidence increasingly supports postbiotics and paraprobiotics as safer, mechanistically targeted alternatives to conventional therapies such as corticosteroids and biologics. Unlike live probiotics, these non-viable microbial derivatives act through defined immune-metabolic pathways that enhance epithelial barrier function, rebalance gut dysbiosis, and modulate oxidative and inflammatory signalling without infection risk or viability concerns. Preclinical studies demonstrate their capacity to inhibit NF-κB activation, promote regulatory T-cell responses, and restore tight-junction integrity, while early clinical investigations suggest symptom improvement and mucosal healing in subsets of UC patients. Despite these advances, translation remains constrained by limited human trials, lack of standardized formulations, dose-response variability, and regulatory ambiguity. This review critically examines mechanistic, preclinical, and clinical findings on postbiotic and para probiotic interventions in UC, highlighting both their therapeutic promise and the translational gaps that must be bridged for clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41222696What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.