ArticleJMIR human factors2025
Perspectives of Older Adults on Assistive Technology: Qualitative Study.
Article in JMIR human factors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of the Windmill Model for Mapping Older Adults' Intrinsic Capacity Using Digital Twin Technology: Descriptive Qualitative Study.JMIR aging · 2026Article
- Multidisciplinary Stakeholder Perspectives on the Design Needs of a Smart Walker for Fall Prevention Among Older Adults: A Qualitative Study in West Java, Indonesia.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The aging population presents challenges for health care systems. Assistive technologies (ATs), such as telemonitoring, fall detection, and self-monitoring devices, offer potential solutions to support older adults and their care. However, successful implementation relies on their acceptance, which remains poorly understood, particularly among nonusers. Objective: This study aimed to explore older adults' perceptions of ATs, including perceived benefits, adoption barriers, and factors influencing willingness to use these technologies. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted with 31 participants (aged ≥65 years) with varying levels of health and care needs. Data were collected through 6 focus groups and 6 in-depth interviews and then analyzed thematically using NVivo software. Results: A total of 7 themes emerged: (1) limited familiarity, with greater recognition of fall detection and self-monitoring devices compared to telemonitoring; (2) perceived benefits, including safety, independence, and chronic disease management; (3) key concerns, including usability, cost, reliability, privacy, and psychological impacts; (4) suggested improvements, including user-friendly designs and training programs; (5) contextual influences identified with independent older adults perceiving greater utility; (6) strategies for ATs' promotion proposed, such as media campaigns, government subsidies, and health care endorsements; and (7) overall willingness to adopt ATs, driven by perceived need, social and health care influence, and ease of use. Conclusions: Although ATs offer clear benefits, adoption remains limited due to usability, cost, and psychological concerns. Improving accessibility, training, and integration into traditional health care service delivery may facilitate acceptance and use. Future research should focus on inclusive designs and policy interventions to maximize ATs' potential in aging populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.