Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41222710›Full record

ReviewJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2026

Clinical utility of digital technologies in Parkinson's disease.

Björn Falkenburger, Alessandra Fanciulli, Monika Pötter-Nerger, Thilo van Eimeren, Joseph Classen, Günter Höglinger, Christoph Redecker, Jürgen Winkler, Jochen Klucken

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Toward the prevention of clinically manifest Parkinson's disease.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Review
  2. Multiple system atrophy: cure and care.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Review
  3. The German Parkinson expert meetings.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Björn FalkenburgerDepartment of Neurology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. bfalken@ukdd.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2387-526X
Alessandra FanciulliDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2854-4179
Monika Pötter-NergerDepartment of Neurology, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7680-2147
Thilo van EimerenDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6951-2325
Joseph ClassenDepartment of Neurology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7182-6967
Günter HöglingerDepartment of Neurology, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), LMU University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU) München, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7587-6187
Christoph RedeckerDepartment of Neurology, Medical School OWL, Klinikum Lippe, Bielefeld University, Lemgo, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7452-0525
Jürgen WinklerDepartment of Neurology, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Jochen KluckenLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), Université du Luxembourg, Centre Hospitalier du Luxembourg, Esch-sur- Alzette, Strassen, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6645-9437

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital health technologies (DHTs) are on the verge of changing treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). This narrative overview article describes DHTs that are already used or in development, focusing on technologies available in Germany and on their clinical utility. Examples include applications that are primarily used by patients, i.e., tools for patient education and empowerment, but also stand-alone interventions improving clinical outcomes including motor and non-motor symptoms. In Germany, these patient-centered DHTs fall under the HTA framework of digital health applications (DIGA). DHT for telemonitoring, in contrast, are designed to support physicians and other healthcare providers and therefore medical devices. DHT are also used increasingly as exploratory endpoints in trials testing neuroprotective treatments.

Indexed as

Digital TechnologyParkinson DiseaseTelemedicineGermanyHumans

Identifiers

PMID41222710
PMCPMC12855330

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.