ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Causal relationships between blood metabolites and glioblastoma risk: a large-scale Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Oral and cardiometabolic health through the lens of biobanks and large-scale epidemiologic research.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGlioblastoma multiforme (GBM) represents the most common and lethal primary brain tumor with incompletely understood pathogenesis. This study aims to systematically evaluate the causal relationships between blood metabolites and glioblastoma risk using Mendelian randomization approaches, providing metabolic biomarker evidence for disease prevention and early diagnosis.
methodsThree Mendelian randomization analytical methods (inverse variance weighted, MR Egger regression, and weighted median) were employed to comprehensively assess causal relationships between multiple blood metabolites and glioblastoma. The study encompassed numerous metabolites including phospholipids, amino acid derivatives, vitamins, and carnitines. Multi-dimensional analytical approaches including forest plots, scatter plots, and funnel plots were used to evaluate effect estimates, dose-response relationships, and potential heterogeneity and pleiotropy bias.
resultsAmong the multiple blood metabolites examined, most showed no significant causal relationship with glioblastoma risk. However, the study identified three key metabolites with significant protective effects: 1-linoleoyl-GPI, tryptophan betaine, and 1-stearoyl-2-oleoyl-GPE. Elevated blood levels of these metabolites demonstrated robust causal relationships with reduced glioblastoma risk, with consistent results across all three analytical methods and no significant horizontal pleiotropy or heterogeneity bias detected.
conclusionsThis study represents the first large-scale Mendelian randomization analysis to establish causal relationships between multiple blood metabolites and glioblastoma risk, particularly identifying protective factors within phospholipid and tryptophan metabolic pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.