ReviewApplied health economics and health policy2026
Data-Related and Methodological Challenges in Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Traditional and Genomic Newborn Screening Programs.
Review in Applied health economics and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Health economic evaluations of genomic newborn screening: Approaches by studies within the international consortium on newborn sequencing.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As newborn screening (NBS) programs consider adding conditions, policymakers would benefit from evidence showing whether early screening offers greater economic and health benefits than standard clinical diagnosis and treatment. However, economic evaluations have not been consistently used to guide decisions on expansion of NBS programs globally. This narrative review discusses data-related and methodological challenges in conducting cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) of NBS programs including (1) difficulties in identifying appropriate comparators and related data, (2) gaps in understanding and limited data on health outcomes and costs of care among children with newborn-screened conditions who received effective treatment after clinical diagnosis without screening, (3) lack of data on short- and longer-term costs and outcomes for affected individuals identified through screening, (4) challenges in distinguishing the effects of screening from improvements in treatment over time, and (5) limited data on costs outside of the healthcare system, limiting the ability to conduct evaluations from the societal perspective. Advancements in genomic technologies, such as genomic sequencing and gene-targeted therapies, are expanding the number of conditions that are potential targets for NBS. Genomic NBS poses additional challenges for CEAs that stem from the ability to simultaneously identify hundreds or even thousands of conditions and limitations of knowledge of genotype-phenotype associations. The data-related challenges discussed herein may encourage cross-disciplinary collaboration to improve data collection. Addressing these methodological issues is imperative for generating reliable evidence on the costs and benefits of NBS program expansion, thereby supporting informed policymaking on adding new conditions to NBS programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41222864What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.