ArticlePloS one2025
Improved CRISPR/Cas9 off-target prediction with DNABERT and epigenetic features.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing Deep Learning Models for Guide RNA Optimization and Off-Target Prediction in CRISPR Systems.Biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- Deep learning-driven prediction of on-target activity, off-target risk, and repair outcomes in CRISPR/Cas9: current landscape and multi-scale perspectives.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CRISPR/Cas9 is a powerful genome editing tool, but its clinical application is hindered by off-target effects. Accurate computational prediction of these unintended edits is crucial for ensuring the safety and efficacy of therapeutic applications. While various deep learning models have been developed, most are trained only on task-specific data, failing to leverage the vast knowledge embedded in entire genomes. To address this limitation, we introduce a novel approach that integrates DNABERT, a deep learning model pre-trained on the human genome, with epigenetic features (H3K4me3, H3K27ac, and ATAC-seq). We conducted a comprehensive benchmark of our model, DNABERT-Epi, against five state-of-the-art methods across seven distinct off-target datasets. Our results demonstrate that the pre-trained DNABERT-based models achieve competitive or even superior performance. Rigorous ablation studies quantitatively confirmed that both genomic pre-training and the integration of epigenetic features are critical factors that significantly enhance predictive accuracy. Furthermore, by applying advanced interpretability techniques (SHAP and Integrated Gradients), we identified the specific epigenetic marks and sequence-level patterns that influence the model's predictions, offering insights into its decision-making process. This study is the first to establish the significant potential of a pre-trained DNA foundation model for CRISPR/Cas9 off-target prediction. Our findings underscore that leveraging both large-scale genomic knowledge and multi-modal data is a key strategy for advancing the development of safer genome editing tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.