Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41223871›Full record

ReviewThe Korean journal of internal medicine2025

Shared decision-making for kidney replacement therapy: a comprehensive review and a proposed model.

Hyun Jung Shin, Seoyoung Choi, Sejoong Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Korean journal of internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hyun Jung ShinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam.
Seoyoung ChoiCollege of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
Sejoong KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam.

Funding

Ministry of Health and Welfare HC20C0054Ministry of Health and Welfare HI19C0481Patient-Centered Clinical Research Coordinating Center
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shared decision-making (SDM) enables patients to actively engage in healthcare decisions by ensuring that treatment options align with their values and preferences. The use of SDM is increasingly recognized in the context of selecting kidney replacement therapy (KRT) for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study reviews the general concept of SDM and global clinical studies on its application in selecting KRT options. Studies have demonstrated the significant benefits of SDM in KRT, including enhanced patient knowledge, satisfaction, autonomy, and increased peritoneal dialysis (PD) selection rates, which may contribute to cost savings. However, challenges remain in implementing SDM owing to time constraints, its dynamic nature, and insufficient incentives. Building on established frameworks, particularly Clayman's six-step model, we propose a new six-step SDM framework tailored to KRT to facilitate its implementation and promote adoption. Further research is required to validate the long-term impacts of SDM, address the heterogeneity of existing interventions, and identify the most effective models for clinical use.

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedDecision Support TechniquesPatient ParticipationRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRenal Replacement TherapyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansKidney failure, chronicPatient-centered carePatient satisfactionRenal dialysis

Identifiers

PMID41223871
PMCPMC12611495

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.