Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41223886›Full record

ArticleEwha medical journal2025

Core principles and structures of geriatric rehabilitation: a narrative review.

Jae-Young Lim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ewha medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jae-Young LimDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea.

Funding

Ministry of Health and Welfare RS-2024-00507183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, rapid population aging-particularly in Korea-has extended life expectancy but not proportionally extended healthy life expectancy, resulting in longer periods of illness or disability and a higher demand for complex medical and social care. Therefore, prolonging healthy life and improving health-related quality of life have become primary objectives in geriatric medicine and rehabilitation. Geriatric rehabilitation is a critical intervention aimed at optimizing the functioning of older adults and pre-morbidly frail individuals who have lost independence due to acute illness or injury. For many older patients, the goal shifts from complete recovery to achieving a new equilibrium, maximizing autonomy despite greater dependency. Geriatric rehabilitation also targets key geriatric syndromes such as frailty, recognizing it as a dynamic and potentially reversible state that provides a crucial "time window" for intervention. This review summarizes the core principles and structural elements essential for geriatric rehabilitation, emphasizing the implementation challenges within the Korean healthcare system. Unlike the European consensus, which supports structured inpatient and outpatient services with seamless transitions of care guided by Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, the Korean healthcare system remains fragmented and heavily centered on acute hospitals. This highlights the urgent need for a systematic model to integrate care facilities and strengthen interprofessional collaboration to support community-based "aging in place." Effective geriatric rehabilitation requires multidisciplinary teams and multifaceted approaches to optimize quality of life, social participation, and independent living. Despite its importance, substantial awareness gaps and policy barriers persist, underscoring an urgent call to action.

Indexed as

AgingFrailtyGeriatricHealthcare systemRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID41223886
PMCPMC12611435

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.