Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41224333›Full record

ArticleSaudi medical journal2025

Prognostic significance of the Borrmann classification in stage 2-3 gastric cancer.

Selcan Cesur, Yonca Yılmaz Ürün

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Selcan CesurFrom the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Cesur), Eskişehir City Hospital, Eskişehir; and from the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Ürün), Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Medical Faculty, Van, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1504-7069
Yonca Yılmaz ÜrünFrom the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Cesur), Eskişehir City Hospital, Eskişehir; and from the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Ürün), Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Medical Faculty, Van, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the prognostic significance of Borrmann classification subtypes in patients with stage 2-3 gastric cancer who underwent surgical treatment.

methodsA retrospective review of 96 gastric cancer patients treated at Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Medical Faculty Hospital from 2008 to 2024 was conducted. Patients were included if they were aged >18 year (yr), had undergone surgery without neoadjuvant therapy, had no distant metastases, and had a postoperative pathological stage of 2-3. Demographic and clinicopathological data were documented, and median overall survival (OS) was analyzed according to the Borrmann classification.

resultsThe median age of the 96 patients was 66 yr, and 36.4% were female. Total gastrectomy was performed in 45.8% of cases. According to the Borrmann classification, type 2 tumors (49%) were the most common. The tumor was most frequently located in the antrum and pylorus (45.8%), and adenocarcinoma was the predominant histopathological type (77.1%). Recurrence was observed in 63.5% of cases. The median OS was 54.66 months, with survival rates of 74.8% at 2 yr and 48.7% at 5 yr. Among Borrmann subtypes, type 1 tumors had the highest median OS (110.1 months) (

conclusionAlthough patients with Borrmann type 1 tumors had the highest OS rate, no significant prognostic differences were observed across the four Borrmann subtypes.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGastrectomyHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateBorrmann classificationstomach neoplasmssurvival rate

Identifiers

PMID41224333
PMCPMC12625679

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.