SynthesisEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2025
Knowledge translation strategies to enhance lung cancer screening programme implementation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Improving Breast Cancer Outcomes by Enhanced Activities in Early Detection and Diagnosis: An Umbrella Review and Meta-Analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials in High-Income Contexts With Universal Healthcare Coverage.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterPooled it
- Application of the Cascade of Care Framework to Guide Evidence-Informed Implementation of Anal Cancer Screening Guidelines.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLow-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening (LCS) improves outcomes including mortality in clinical trials, but it is unclear whether this evidence is implemented effectively in real-world practice settings. This systematic review explored how knowledge translation (KT) strategies have been used to improve knowledge, decisional confidence and participation in LDCT LCS programmes.
methodsLiterature searches were performed for comparative studies incorporating KT strategies in relation to LDCT LCS. Articles included a KT intervention intended to facilitate knowledge, participation in screening, improve decisional confidence or increase screening uptake.
results40 studies were selected for data extraction. Studies emanated from the USA (36), Canada (one), the UK (two) and Japan (one), published between 2014 and 2024. KT interventions reported included 41 implementation strategies targeting staff training, patient and provider education, shared decision-making tools, nurse clinics, navigators, forms, electronic reminders and triggers, data presentation modalities, materials targeting specific populations, and quality improvement tools. Meta-analysis identified significant increase in knowledge of risk (OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.29-6.38), LCS candidacy (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.51-4.14), risk-benefit knowledge (OR 2.82, 95% CI 1.21-6.58), awareness of screening test (OR 11.91, 9.00-15.76) and increased LCS screening participation (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.44-3.47) in response to KT strategies.
conclusionThis systematic review identified multiple studies addressing the utilisation and effectiveness of implementation science strategies in KT interventions in the context of LCS. These included a broad range of implementation strategies and KT methodologies that were associated with increased LCS knowledge and participation. There is an urgent need to identify effective implementation strategies leading to enhanced knowledge and screening participation amongst at risk individuals in LDCT LCS programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.