ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2025
Continued versus discontinued oral anticoagulant treatment for unprovoked venous thromboembolism: target trial emulation.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of anesthesia methods for limb and lower abdominal surgeries with postoperative outcomes in patients requiring home oxygen therapy: a nationwide cohort study in Japan.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
- Residual thromboembolic risk and outcomes of oral anticoagulation discontinuation after atrial fibrillation ablation: a target trial emulation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
- The clinical value of PLR, NLR, and MLR in predicting mortality risk in hospitalized patients.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the effect on health outcomes of continuing or discontinuing oral anticoagulants (OACs) among patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) after initial treatment for at least 90 days.
designTarget trial emulation.
settingOptum Clinformatics Data Mart (Optum CDM) from 1 January 2009 to 28 Februray 2025, and Medicare fee-for-service claims from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2022, United States.
participantsAdults with VTE aged ≥18 years (Optum CDM) or ≥65 years (Medicare) initiating OACs (warfarin or direct OACs) within 30 days after a first hospital admission with VTE without reversible provoking factors and who continued treatment for ≥90 days. Propensity score one-to-one matching was performed between patients who continued and those who discontinued treatment (ie, absence of a refilled prescription within 30 days).
main outcome measuresThe primary outcomes were hospital admission for recurrent VTE (effectiveness) and major bleeding (safety). Secondary outcomes were net clinical benefit (a composite of recurrent VTE and bleeding) and mortality. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios and generalized linear models estimated rate differences per 1000 person years. Analyses were stratified by length of initial OAC treatment (90-179, 180-359, 360-719, 720-1079, or ≥1080 days).
resultsThe study cohort included 30 554 propensity score matched pairs who had continued or discontinued an OAC (mean age 73.9 years, 57.0% women). After initial anticoagulation of ≥90 days, compared with those who discontinued treatment, those who continued treatment had markedly lower rates of recurrent VTE (adjusted hazard ratio 0.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13 to 0.29; adjusted rate difference per 1000 person years -25.50, 95% CI -39.38 to -11.63), higher rates of major bleeding (1.75, 1.52 to 2.02; 4.78, 1.95 to 7.61), lower mortality rates (0.74, 0.69 to 0.79; -14.31, -22.02 to -6.59), and greater net clinical benefit (0.39, 0.36 to 0.42; -21.01, -32.31 to -9.71). The greater net clinical benefit was consistent across OAC types and length of initial OAC treatment.
conclusionBased on two US nationally representative routine care databases, continuing versus discontinuing OAC after initial anticoagulation of ≥90 days was associated with lower risk of recurrent VTE, higher risk of major bleeding, and a net clinical benefit. This observation persisted among those using OACs for at least three years after VTE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.