Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41224762›Full record

ReviewNPJ microgravity2025

Spaceflight Standard Measures is a multidisciplinary study that systematically monitors risks to astronaut health and performance.

John G Hardy, Corey A Theriot, Thomas Oswald, Gilles Clément

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ microgravity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

John G HardyJES Tech, 16870 Royal Crest Drive, Houston, TX, 77058, USA.
Corey A TheriotUniversity of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Drive, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA.
Thomas OswaldKBR, 2400 E NASA Parkway, Houston, TX, 77058, USA.
Gilles ClémentKBR, 2400 E NASA Parkway, Houston, TX, 77058, USA. gilles.r.clement@nasa.gov.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spaceflight Standard Measures is an integrated research study designed to characterize how spaceflight affects the health and performance of astronauts. Standardizing the research methods allows for robust monitoring of individuals and allows comparison between crewmembers of different missions of various durations. This manuscript reviews the objectives of the Spaceflight Standard Measures project, and details how each disciplinary component is used to monitor spaceflight-induced human risks. It also covers the timeline of data collection, the methods used to analyze the data, and the process for requesting access to the data. With the impending return to lunar operations and exploration of deep space, an urgent need exists for high-quality, multidisciplinary investigations to inform programmatic and operational decisions. The Spaceflight Standard Measures model provides a standardized, flexible research approach, fostering collaboration across agencies to create a strong evidence base that can be used to safely advance human spaceflight into multiplanetary exploration.

Identifiers

PMID41224762
PMCPMC12612093

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.