Observational studyScientific reports2025
Sleep quality and body composition in active and inactive young adults.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Age-Dependent Association Between Insomnia and Body Mass Index Among Young Women: Evidence from a Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Body composition is influenced by a variety of internal and external factors, with early adulthood being a particularly sensitive period for its fluctuations. This observational study aimed to assess the differences in body composition, anthropometric indices, and sleep quality between active and inactive young adults as well as to explore the relationship between these parameters. A group of one hundred young adults were recruited for the study and assigned to two groups: physically active and physically inactive. Physical activity was assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-SF), sleep quality was assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and body composition was measured using the validated InBody 770 analyzer. Participants were classified as physically active if they achieved a "moderate" or "high" activity level according to IPAQ-SF scoring criteria, which includes individuals engaging in at least 600 MET-minutes of physical activity per week. Those categorized as physically inactive scored at the "low" level, not meeting the thresholds for moderate or high activity. Physically active individuals showed significantly more favorable body composition, including higher total body water, muscle mass, and bone mineral content, as well as lower fat mass, BMI, WHR, WHtR, and ABSI values (all p < 0.001). They also had significantly better sleep quality, as indicated by lower Global Sleep Score (GSS) scores (p < 0.001). Significant associations were observed between sleep quality and body composition parameters, such as a positive correlation between the GSS and fat mass, as well as negative correlations between GSS and total body water, fat-free mass, and bone mineral content. Additionally, GSS showed positive correlations with both WHR and WHtR (p < 0.05). No significant associations were found between the GSS and muscle mass, nor between GSS and ABSI (p > 0.05). These findings suggest that regular physical activity is related to more favorable body composition and better sleep quality. Moreover, specific components of body composition, particularly fat mass and indicators of central adiposity, appear to be significantly associated with sleep quality, highlighting a potential link between metabolic health and sleep patterns. However, due to the cross-sectional nature of the study, causality cannot be inferred.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.