Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41225215›Full record

ReviewNature medicine2025

Advancing equitable and sustainable urban health.

Ana V Diez Roux, Usama Bilal

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ana V Diez RouxUrban Health Collaborative, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. avd37@drexel.edu.
Usama BilalUrban Health Collaborative, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9868-7773

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cities house most of humanity and will continue to grow, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Rapid, unmanaged growth can generate adverse health impacts, including non-communicable diseases, infectious diseases and injuries, while magnifying social and environmental inequities. Urban health is shaped by intertwined social and physical environments that act over the life course and are embedded in upstream social and economic systems. In this Perspective, we outline four research priorities for equitable and sustainable urban health. First, sharper descriptive work is needed to expose within- and between-city health gaps and to track trends to spur action. Second, stronger causal studies-using longitudinal data, quasi-experiments and systems modeling-can clarify how urban factors impact health across diverse settings. Third, rigorous evaluations and simulations of the effects of transportation, housing, fiscal and climate policies are needed to quantify cobenefits for health, equity and sustainability, and guide multi-sector action. Fourth, meaningful engagement with communities and policymakers, from agenda setting to dissemination, will ensure that evidence is locally relevant and politically usable. Cities are uniquely positioned to reduce health inequities and contribute to environmental sustainability. Doing so requires political will, robust evidence, and multisectoral collaboration to build healthier, more equitable, and more sustainable urban futures.

Indexed as

Health EquityUrban HealthCitiesHumans

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.