Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41225372›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2025

Genetic parameters estimation and optimization of genomic selection in mud crab (Scylla paramamosain): a case study for growth-related traits.

Xiyi Zhou, Zhenying Hong, Wenxiao Cui, Yin Zhang, Mhd Ikhwanuddin, Shaopan Ye, Hongyu Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiyi ZhouGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, Shantou University, 243 Daxue Road, Shantou, 515063, China.
Zhenying HongGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, Shantou University, 243 Daxue Road, Shantou, 515063, China.
Wenxiao CuiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, Shantou University, 243 Daxue Road, Shantou, 515063, China.
Yin ZhangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, Shantou University, 243 Daxue Road, Shantou, 515063, China.
Mhd IkhwanuddinInternational Joint Research Center for the Development and Utilization of Important Mariculture Varieties Surrounding the South China Sea Region, Shantou University, Shantou, 515063, China.
Shaopan YeGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, Shantou University, 243 Daxue Road, Shantou, 515063, China. spye@stu.edu.cn.
Hongyu MaGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, Shantou University, 243 Daxue Road, Shantou, 515063, China. mahy@stu.edu.cn.

Funding

Research on breeding technology of candidate species for Guangdong modern marine ranching 2024-MRB-00-001the National Natural Science Foundation of China 32202916the National Natural Science Foundation of China 32473150the Program of Agricultural and Rural Department of Guangdong Province 2024-SPY-00-013the Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province STKJ202209035the Special Projects in Key Fields of Colleges and Universities in Guangdong Province 2021ZDZX4021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenomic selection (GS) has become a preferred method for genetic improvement in aquaculture species. However, its application in mud crab (Scylla paramamosain) remains limited. Given that the prediction accuracy of GS varies across species and is influenced by several factors, including statistical models, marker density, and the size of the reference population, a systematic investigation of GS in mud crab is necessary. To explore the impact of these factors on GS and optimize the application strategies of GS in mud crab breeding, a total of 508 mud crabs were genotyped by the 40 K liquid SNP array (named "Xiexin No. 1") to estimate genetic parameters of growth traits and systematically investigate the impact of prediction models, SNP density, and reference population size on GS.

resultsResults showed that the genomic heritability for body weight (BW), carapace length (CL), carapace width (CW), and body height (BH) was 0.860 ± 0.043, 0.554 ± 0.081, 0.521 ± 0.083, and 0.597 ± 0.077, respectively. Different models (GBLUP, rrBLUP, BayesA, BayesB, BayesC, and BayesR) exhibited similar prediction accuracies for four growth-related traits, with ranges of 0.510-0.515, 0.569-0.574, 0.567-0.570, and 0.543-0.548 for BW, CL, CW, and BH, respectively, but GBLUP showed advantages in computational efficiency. Notably, the accuracy of GS for four growth-related traits would be further improved as the SNP density increased but began to plateau after 10 K SNPs. When SNP density increased from 0.5 K to 33 K, the average prediction accuracies of six models for BW, CL, CW, and BH were improved by 6.22%, 4.20%, 4.40%, and 5.23%, respectively. Moreover, the prediction accuracy of GS was also improved as the number of reference individuals increased. When the reference population size expanded from 30 to 400, the average prediction accuracies of six models for BW, CL, CW, and BH increased by 8.66%, 3.99%, 4.97% and 4.56%, respectively. In addtion, the prediction unbiasedness of GBLUP, BayesA, BayesB, and BayesC were close to 1, only when the reference population size was more than 150.

conclusionsTaken together, the reference population comprising at least 150 samples genotyped with over 10 K SNPs is the minimum standard for implementing GS of growth-related traits in mud crab. Our results would provide valuable insights and practical recommendations on implementing GS in mud crab genetic breeding programs.

Indexed as

BrachyuraGenomicsQuantitative Trait, HeritableSelection, GeneticAnimalsBayes TheoremBreedingGenomeGenotypeModels, GeneticPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideGenomic selectionGrowth-related traitsPrediction accuracyS. paramamosain

Identifiers

PMID41225372
PMCPMC12613491

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.