ArticleBMC nephrology2025
Experiences of individuals undergoing maintenance hemodialysis during the COVID-19 pandemic in China: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient-centered care for patients requiring dialysis during disasters and public health emergencies: a scoping review.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Review
- Influential factors of benefit finding in hemodialysis patients: a qualitative study using the social-ecological model.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic, coupled with China's stringent "zero-COVID" policy, posed unprecedented challenges for individuals undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD). Access to dialysis care was significantly disrupted by lockdowns, transportation limitations, and the reallocation of healthcare resources. Despite these systemic barriers, the interaction between such constraints and patients' personal experiences has not been thoroughly investigated. Therefore, this study seeks to explore the lived experiences of individuals receiving MHD in China during the pandemic, with particular attention to their access to care, psychosocial well-being, and coping mechanisms.
methodsA descriptive qualitative study was carried out at a tertiary hospital in Chongqing, China. Sixteen adult participants undergoing MHD were purposively recruited to take part in ten semi-structured interviews and one focus group discussion involving six participants. Data collection occurred between November and December 2023, and the information obtained was analyzed using thematic analysis based on Braun and Clarke's framework to identify major themes and corresponding subthemes.
findingsThe analysis led to the identification of five major themes and sixteen subthemes that captured the lived experiences of individuals receiving MHD during the COVID-19 pandemic. These themes encompassed systemic barriers to accessing care, perceived uncertainty about infection control and environmental safety, mental health challenges, self-management approaches, and the influence of family, social, and professional support. The findings highlighted the multifaceted difficulties faced by hemodialysis patients during the pandemic, underscoring the vital importance of personalized coping mechanisms and strong social support systems in sustaining treatment adherence and promoting mental well-being.
conclusionChina's pandemic control measures created significant barriers to dialysis access and contributed to heightened psychological distress among patients. In response, many individuals employed self-management strategies to reduce the impact of these disruptions. The findings highlight the need for patient-centered interventions, particularly those aimed at enhancing transportation accessibility, incorporating mental health support, and addressing disparities in rural healthcare. Future studies should adopt integrated qualitative and quantitative methodologies to better inform pandemic preparedness and response strategies for dialysis-dependent populations. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.