ArticleIsrael journal of health policy research2025
Trends in compassionate use of medicinal products: Israel 2020-2024.
Article in Israel journal of health policy research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCompassionate use programs allow patients with life-threating and serious conditions to access investigational therapies when standard treatments are inadequate. This study aims to analyze the trends and outcomes of the compassionate use of medicinal products in Israel.
methodsData from the Israeli Ministry of Health's compassionate use database (2020-2024) were anonymized and analyzed. Duplicates were removed, and a pivot table was used to assess factors such as active ingredients, indications, treatment counts, and patient demographics. Results were presented as counts and percentages, with treatments over 0.5% of the total classified as common. Statistical analyses included Student's t-test and chi-squared test for subgroup differences (p < 0.05 significant). Commonly used medicinal products were cross-referenced with the MOH drug database for registration and reimbursement status.
resultsA total of 3,284 compassionate treatments were administered, employing 596 distinct medicinal products to address 1,361 conditions in 2020-2024. Temporal analysis identified a peak in 2020, which accounted for 24% of total treatments, followed by a decrease thereafter. Patient age stratification indicated that those aged 65 to 80 received the highest treatment proportion (26%), while the 45 to 65 age group accounted for 19%. Treatments were mainly concentrated in large central hospitals (77%) and the central district (49%), with the southern district showing the least usage. The authorization process was primarily for the continuation of study drug in 63% of cases. Additionally, Belantamab mafodotin and Trametinib were the most frequently utilized medicinal products, accounting for 9% and 8.6% of treatments, respectively. Disease category analysis revealed that relapsed refractory multiple myeloma, central nervous system tumors, and inflammatory bowel disease were among the top conditions treated, varying by age group. Notably, 60% of the most common technologies (13 out of 22) were subsequently included into the national health basket, typically following an extended period of compassionate use that exceeded two years.
conclusionThe study suggests that Israel's compassionate use programs have accelerated early access to novel therapies for complex conditions and provided a bridge to the inclusion of novel medicinal products in the national health basket. Nonetheless, the study identifies a concerning downward trend in utilization alongside potential access disparities, thereby underscoring the necessity for further targeted investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.