ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025
Effect of clinical pharmacist's intervention on perioperative prophylaxis of antimicrobial drugs in AIDS patients.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the effect of clinical pharmacists' intervention using perioperative special prescription review mode on the preventive use of perioperative antimicrobial drug in Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) patients with clean incision surgery in the First hospital of Changsha. MATERIALS AND
methodsWith reference to the latest guidelines and expert consensus worldwide, the National Health Commission's guiding principles for the clinical application of antimicrobial drugs were used as the basis for review. The perioperative antimicrobial drug review criteria were formulated, and the special prescription review model was established by combination of administrative interventions and other measures. Sampling was conducted according to the type of surgery, and 109 AIDS patients with clean incision surgery in our hospital from January 2020 to June 2021 were grouped into the control group, and 110 HIV patients with clean incision surgery who received the clinical pharmacists' intervention from July 2021 to December 2022 were categorized into the intervention group. Perioperative antimicrobial drug use and hospitalization-related indexes were compared between the two groups.
resultsAfter the intervention of clinical pharmacists, there was a significant decrease on the rate of unreasonable perioperative prophylactic use of antimicrobial drugs in AIDS patients with clean incision. A significant reduction was also seen in the length of hospitalization, Defined Daily Doses (DDD) of antibacterial drugs, cost of antibiotics, and duration of preventive use of antibiotics.
conclusionFor surgical AIDS patients, the intervention of clinical pharmacists contributes to enhancing the rationality of antimicrobial drug use, and reducing the hospitalization cost of patients during the perioperative period of clean incision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.