ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2025
Enhancing multi-task in vivo toxicity prediction via integrated knowledge transfer of chemical knowledge and in vitro toxicity information.
Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The evaluation of potential drug toxicity is a crucial step in early drug development. in vivo toxicity assessment represents a key challenge that must be addressed before advancing to clinical trials. However, traditional in vivo experiments primarily rely on animal models, raising concerns regarding cost, time efficiency, and ethical considerations. To address these challenges, various computational approaches have been developed to support in vivo toxicity evaluations, though these methods often demonstrate limited generalizability due to data scarcity. In this study, we propose MT-Tox, a knowledge transfer-based multi-task learning model specifically designed for in vivo toxicity prediction that overcomes data scarcity. Our model implements a sequential knowledge transfer strategy across three stages: general chemical knowledge pretraining, in vitro toxicological auxiliary training, and in vivo toxicity fine-tuning. This hierarchical approach significantly improves model performance by systematically leveraging information from both chemical structure and toxicity data sources. MT-Tox outperforms baseline models across three in vivo toxicity endpoints: carcinogenicity, drug-induced liver injury (DILI), and genotoxicity. Through ablation studies and attention analyses, we demonstrate that each knowledge transfer technique makes meaningful contributions to the prediction process. Finally, we demonstrate the real-world application of our model as a prediction tool for early-stage drug discovery through comprehensive DrugBank database screening.Scientific contribution: We propose a knowledge transfer framework that integrates chemical and in vitro toxicological information to enhance in vivo toxicity prediction in low-data regimes. Our model provides dual-level interpretability across chemical and biological domains through attention mechanism. Moreover, we demonstrate our model's applicability by screening the DrugBank database, simulating practical toxicity screening scenarios in drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.