Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41225653›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2025

Negligence in data recording during institutional birth: exploring health workers' perspectives on the barriers and enablers of data documentation practices.

Biniam Kefiyalew Taye, Lemma Derseh Gezie, Asmamaw Atnafu, Shegaw Anagaw Mengiste, Jens Kaasbøll, Monika Knudsen Gullslett, Binyam Tilahun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Biniam Kefiyalew TayeDepartment of Health Informatics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia. bini.bhi2013@gmail.com.
Lemma Derseh GezieDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Asmamaw AtnafuDepartment of Health System and Policy, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Shegaw Anagaw MengisteManagement Information Systems, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway.
Jens KaasbøllDepartment of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Monika Knudsen GullslettFaculty of Health & Social Sciences, Science Center Health & Technology, University of South-Eastern Norway, Notodden, Norway.
Binyam TilahunDepartment of Health Informatics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe availability of well-documented records during labor and delivery is essential for monitoring childbirth and ensuring positive outcomes for mothers and newborns. However, recent research in northwestern Ethiopia shows that data recording during these critical periods is inadequately performed. This study explored the barriers and enablers of data recording practices during institutional childbirth in this region.

methodsA descriptive qualitative study was conducted in six health centers in the Wegera district, focusing on three source documents: one facility-level log (the Delivery Register) and two personal records (the Integrated Card and the Women's Folder). An interview guide was used to collect spoken accounts from 14 health workers. The spoken data was transcribed and analyzed using thematic framework analysis, assisted by ATLAS.ti (version 9.1.3).

resultsThis study identified three primary barriers to recording institutional birth data: organizational, behavioral, and technical. Four key subthemes emerged from the analysis within the organizational barriers category: the workload during childbirth, the lack of supervision of data within personal records, a lack of accountability for recording, and the turnover of trained staff responsible for data management. Behavioral barriers included health workers neglecting data recording and negative attitudes toward documentation. Regarding technical obstacles, the complexity of data recording formats presents challenges, resulting in missing data and errors when transferring data from one source to another. Despite these barriers, the study highlighted enablers, all of which were organizational, including the presence of routine data quality reviews, training, and supervision from the higher officials.

conclusionsThis study examines health workers' perspectives in northwestern Ethiopia on the barriers and enablers to recording birth data, focusing on women's personal records. It shows that weak organizational emphasis on client-level documentation and limited accountability for personal records diminishes motivation and contributes to neglect of crucial data. Busy settings, marked by heavy workloads, staff shortages, and competing priorities, further undermine confidence in maintaining accurate records. Interventions should aim to enhance motivation, build staff self-esteem in documenting under pressure, and foster a sense of professional responsibility. Promoting a positive attitude toward detailed record-keeping is also essential.

Indexed as

BarriersChildbirthData accuracyData recordingEnablersEthiopiaWorkload

Identifiers

PMID41225653
PMCPMC12613777

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.