ArticleBMC psychology2025
Psychosocial symptom networks and high-risk sexual behaviors among men who have sex with men: a network analysis.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPsychosocial problems are prevalent among men who have sex with men (MSM) and are linked to high-risk sexual behaviors. Previous studies have often examined these factors separately, without considering their interconnections. Network analysis offers a way to explore these relationships, but has seldom been applied to MSM in the context of both mental health and sexual risk. This study aimed to: (1) model psychosocial symptom networks among MSM; (2) compare network structures across demographic subgroups; and (3) examine how central symptoms relate to high-risk sexual behaviors.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among 405 MSM in Taizhou, China, using venue-based and online snowball sampling. Psychosocial problems—including depression, anxiety, self-esteem, internalized homonegativity, loneliness, perceived social support, and sociosexual orientation—were assessed using validated self-report scales. High-risk sexual behavior was measured based on condom use and number of sexual partners. Network analysis was used to examine symptom-level associations, and network comparison tests explored differences across demographic subgroups. Associations between central symptoms and high-risk behaviors were examined using correlation and regression analyses.
resultsAmong 405 MSM, 12.4% reported moderate-to-severe depression and 10.1% moderate-to-severe anxiety. Strongest network connections appeared between depression and anxiety, and between loneliness and sociosexual desire. Central nodes included ‘feeling nervous’, desire for uncommitted sexual relationships, ‘feeling tired’, ‘lacking companionship’, and ‘no good’. Significant structural differences were found between participants < 33 years and those ≥ 33 years (p = 0.017), with older individuals showing generally weaker psychosocial connections. Central symptoms were significantly associated with risky sexual behaviors, especially in younger participants.
conclusionsEmotional distress, low self-esteem, loneliness, and sociosexual desire emerged as central psychosocial problems linked to high-risk sexual behaviors among MSM. Network structures differed by age, with younger MSM showing stronger interconnections. These findings highlight the need for age-specific, targeted interventions to reduce sexual risk and improve mental health among MSM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.