ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Characterizing Root Morphology, Water and Nitrogen Uptake of Fibrous-Root and Taproot Crops Under Transparent Soil.
Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An introduction to the fundamentals of root systems research in cultivated plants.Annals of botany · 2026Review
- Nitrogen use efficiency of flue-cured tobacco genotypes: physiological basis and relative contributions of nitrogen uptake and utilization.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Comparison and screening of chemical topping agents for optimizing root-shoot coordination, photosynthetic efficiency and yield in south of the Tianshan mountains in Xinjiang.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Root morphology and uptake capacity are increasingly investigated as indicators of crop performance, yet their characterization remains challenging in laboratory. Soil or sand are opaque to most forms of radiation, while transparent medium fails to provide soil-relevant characteristics. Transparent soil (TS) is specifically designed to support root growth in the presence of air, water, and nutrients, enabling in situ root phenotyping. An indoor experiment was conducted, involving three growth mediums (natural soil, TS, hydroponics), two fibrous-root crop species (wheat, maize) and two taproot crop species (cotton, soybean), to evaluate the impact of TS on root morphology and water and nitrogen uptake of crops with different root types. Results showed that, compared with the average difference between hydroponics and natural soil, the average difference in root morphology and water and nitrogen uptake of maize between TS and natural soil was significantly decreased, as well as for cotton, soybeans, and wheat in turn. It was concluded that compared to those developed in hydroponics, the root developed in TS was significantly more similar to those developed in natural soil. Yet such similarity varied across crop species, with no clear correlation to root types. These findings provide a theoretical foundation for promoting the application of TS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.