Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41226269›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Degradable Alternatives to Single-Use Plastics: Mechanisms, Materials, and Strategies for Sustainable Polyolefin Replacement.

Hamza Fakhrizada, Yaser Dahman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hamza FakhrizadaDepartment of Electrical, Computer & Biomedical Engineering, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.ORCID 0009-0003-0122-0531
Yaser DahmanDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9118-5455

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The widespread use of single-use plastics, particularly polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP), has resulted in severe environmental pollution due to their durability and resistance to degradation. This report reviews current degradable alternatives to conventional polyolefins and strategies for enhancing their breakdown in natural and managed environments. Mechanisms of abiotic and biotic degradation are examined alongside the influence of environmental factors and standardized testing protocols. Commercially available biodegradable polymers-such as polylactic acid (PLA), polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), poly(butylene succinate) (PBS), poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT), starch-based plastics, cellulose derivatives, chitosan, and protein-based materials-are evaluated for their sources, degradation behavior, applications, scalability, and limitations. In addition, modification techniques for PE and PP, including copolymerization, pro-degradant additives, blending with biodegradable fillers, surface functionalization, enzyme-assisted degradation, and photocatalytic additives, are critically assessed for their potential to reduce environmental persistence. Key challenges such as performance trade-offs, incomplete degradation, ecotoxicity, cost, scalability, and end-of-life management are discussed within the context of circular economic integration. This report concludes with future research directions aimed at developing cost-effective, high-performance materials that degrade completely under real-world conditions while minimizing ecological impacts.

Indexed as

abiotic and biotic degradationbiodegradable polymerscircular economycompostability standardsoxo-biodegradable plasticspolyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA)polylactic acid (PLA)polyolefin degradationpro-degradant additivessustainable plastic alternatives

Identifiers

PMID41226269
PMCPMC12609699

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.