SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Uric Acid in Cerebral Ischemia: A Systematic Review of Its Biomarker Value and Role in Neuroprotection.
Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of Serum Uric Acid Level as a Risk Factor and Severity Marker With Acute Ischemic Stroke.Cureus · 2026Article
- Association between uric acid to lymphocyte ratio and poor functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- A comprehensive study on the uric acid to high-density cholesterol ratio influencing cardiometabolic-based chronic disease in China.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Uric acid (UA), the end product of purine metabolism, exhibits dual roles in cerebral ischemia-it functions as a cerebroprotective antioxidant in acute settings and as a pro-oxidant contributor to vascular damage in chronic conditions. Some studies suggest that higher UA levels may confer protection during the acute phase of stroke, particularly in subgroups such as women, hyperglycemic patients, and thrombectomy recipients. In contrast, chronic hyperuricemia has been consistently linked to adverse cardiovascular outcomes, increased stroke recurrence, and poor recovery. A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to April 2025. Eligible studies included adults with acute ischemic stroke in whom UA levels were reported within 72 h of onset. Primary outcomes were mortality, functional outcome (mRS), and neurological deterioration. Thirty-five studies involving over 15,000 patients were included. Evidence regarding UA's prognostic value was heterogeneous. Approximately 80% of studies identified high UA levels as being associated with increased mortality, stroke recurrence, or disability. However, randomized trials-notably the URICO-ICTUS trial-suggested short-term neuroprotective effects in specific subgroups. Several studies also reported U- or J-shaped relationships, indicating that both low and high UA levels may adversely affect outcomes. Uric acid demonstrates a paradoxical role in cerebral ischemia. Acute-phase antioxidant effects may offer therapeutic potential, whereas chronic hyperuricemia is more often associated with vascular injury and worse long-term outcomes. UA may serve as a useful biomarker when incorporated into multifactorial prognostic models, but further well-controlled studies are needed to clarify its clinical utility in stroke prognosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.