SynthesisInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
Anticancer Potential of Whey Proteins-A Systematic Review of Bioactivity and Functional Mechanisms.
Synthesis in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Biomarkers as Temporal Signals: A Decision-Linked Multi-Layer Framework for Exercise Recovery, Overload, and Adaptation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer remains a primary global health concern, with treatment-related side effects and malnutrition posing significant challenges to patient care and recovery. In recent years, there has been growing interest in the therapeutic potential of functional food components, especially whey proteins (WPs), due to their notable antioxidant, immunomodulatory, and anticancer properties. This systematic review explores the effects of WPs across various cancer types and assesses their value as supportive nutritional agents. A thorough literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, identifying 24 relevant studies published between 2000 and 2024. The selection process followed PRISMA guidelines. The evidence, drawn from both laboratory and clinical research, suggests that WPs may exert anticancer effects by inhibiting tumor cell growth, promoting apoptosis, enhancing antioxidant defenses, modulating immune activity, and influencing signaling pathways such as the PI3K/Akt, mTOR, and Wnt/β-catenin pathways. Colorectal, breast, and liver cancers emerged as the most extensively studied types. Additionally, the form of WP used-whether concentrate, isolate, or hydrolysate-appeared to influence both biological activity and clinical outcomes. Clinical findings suggest that WP supplementation may support nutritional status, mitigate the adverse effects of chemotherapy, and enhance the quality of life in cancer patients. While the preclinical data are compelling, further high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these benefits and determine optimal use in clinical practice. This review highlights WPs as promising, well-tolerated nutritional agents with potential to enhance current cancer care strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.