Evidence mapPaperPMID 41226495Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Pathological and Functional Brain Amyloids: A New Concept Explaining the Differences.

Alexey P Galkin, Vladimir A Mitkevich, Alexander A Makarov, Anna A Valina, Evgeniy I Sysoev

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexey P GalkinSt. Petersburg Branch, Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7362-8857
Vladimir A MitkevichEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Alexander A MakarovEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Anna A ValinaSt. Petersburg Branch, Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0009-0004-8951-2295
Evgeniy I SysoevSt. Petersburg Branch, Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 199034 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1444-9784

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 19-74-30007Russian Science Foundation 24-14-00233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, amyloid proteins that perform vital functions in the brain have been characterized. The question of why some amyloids are neurotoxic while others are harmless remains open. Here, we provide a brief overview of pathological and functional brain amyloids and present a comparative analysis of their amino acid sequences based on the percentage of hydrophobic and charged residues, as well as their enrichment in glutamine, asparagine, serine, and glycine. We demonstrate that pathological and functional brain amyloid proteins, along with their amyloidogenic fragments, do not differ in amino acid composition, contrary to previous assumptions. The ability of an amyloid to cause toxicity can instead be explained by the concept of "available targets". Evidence from studies of pathological amyloids demonstrate that their toxicity is determined not only by a loss of function but also by aberrant interactions with specific targets, such as PrP

Indexed as

AmyloidAmyloidogenic ProteinsBrainAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsHumansAmyloidAmyloidogenic Proteinsamyloidogenic coresamyloids’ functional partnersbraincellular localizationcomparative analysisfunctional vs. pathological amyloidsneurodegenerative diseasesneurotoxicitypathological targetsprotein misfolding

Identifiers

PMID41226495
PMCPMC12609487

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.