Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41226562›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Design, Characterization, and Enhanced Performance of Electrospun Chitosan-Based Nanocomposites Reinforced with Halloysite Nanotubes and Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles for Wound Healing Applications.

Valentina A Petrova, Natallia V Dubashynskaya, Sergei G Zhuravskii, Daria N Poshina, Alexey S Golovkin, Alexander I Mishanin, Iosif V Gofman, Elena M Ivan'kova, Maria Y Naumenko, Galina Y Yukina and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Valentina A PetrovaBranch of Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute named by B.P. Konstantinov of National Research Centre «Kurchatov Institute»-Institute of Macromolecular Compounds, Bolshoi VO 31, St. Petersburg 199004, Russia.
Natallia V DubashynskayaBranch of Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute named by B.P. Konstantinov of National Research Centre «Kurchatov Institute»-Institute of Macromolecular Compounds, Bolshoi VO 31, St. Petersburg 199004, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4399-9374
Sergei G ZhuravskiiHearing and Speech Laboratory, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, L'va Tolstogo 6-8, St. Petersburg 197022, Russia.
Daria N PoshinaBranch of Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute named by B.P. Konstantinov of National Research Centre «Kurchatov Institute»-Institute of Macromolecular Compounds, Bolshoi VO 31, St. Petersburg 199004, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5342-0605
Alexey S GolovkinAlmazov National Medical Research Centre, Akkuratova 2, St. Petersburg 197341, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7577-628X
Alexander I MishaninAlmazov National Medical Research Centre, Akkuratova 2, St. Petersburg 197341, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3948-1799
Iosif V GofmanBranch of Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute named by B.P. Konstantinov of National Research Centre «Kurchatov Institute»-Institute of Macromolecular Compounds, Bolshoi VO 31, St. Petersburg 199004, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1939-2660
Elena M Ivan'kovaBranch of Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute named by B.P. Konstantinov of National Research Centre «Kurchatov Institute»-Institute of Macromolecular Compounds, Bolshoi VO 31, St. Petersburg 199004, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4823-0695
Maria Y NaumenkoAlmazov National Medical Research Centre, Akkuratova 2, St. Petersburg 197341, Russia.
Galina Y YukinaLaboratory of Pathomorphology, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, L'va Tolstogo 6-8, St. Petersburg 197022, Russia.
Elena G SukhorukovaLaboratory of Pathomorphology, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, L'va Tolstogo 6-8, St. Petersburg 197022, Russia.
Arina D FilippovaKurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninskii 31, Moscow 119071, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2725-8891
Vladimir K IvanovKurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninskii 31, Moscow 119071, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2343-2140
Alexander V YakimanskyBranch of Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute named by B.P. Konstantinov of National Research Centre «Kurchatov Institute»-Institute of Macromolecular Compounds, Bolshoi VO 31, St. Petersburg 199004, Russia.
Yury A SkorikBranch of Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute named by B.P. Konstantinov of National Research Centre «Kurchatov Institute»-Institute of Macromolecular Compounds, Bolshoi VO 31, St. Petersburg 199004, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9731-6399

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of advanced wound dressings that integrate favorable physico-mechanical properties with the ability to support physiological healing processes remains a critical challenge in biomaterials science. An ideal dressing should modulate the wound microenvironment, prevent infection, maintain hydration, and possess adequate strength and elasticity. This study aimed to fabricate and characterize electrospun chitosan (CS)-based 3D scaffolds dual-reinforced with halloysite nanotubes (HNTs) and cerium oxide nanoparticles (CeONPs) to enhance material properties and biological performance. HNTs were incorporated to improve electrospinnability and provide mechanical reinforcement, while CeONPs were added for their redox-modulating and anti-inflammatory activities. Composite mats were fabricated via non-capillary electrospinning. The individual and synergistic effects of HNTs and CeONPs were systematically evaluated using physico-chemical methods (SEM, EDX, WAXS, TGA, mechanical testing) and biological assays (in vitro cytocompatibility with mesenchymal stem cells, in vivo biocompatibility, and wound healing efficacy in a rat model). Scaffolds containing only HNTs exhibited defect-free nanofibers with an average diameter of 151 nm, whereas the dual-filler (CS-PEO-HNT-CeONP) composites showed less uniform fibers with a rough surface and a larger average diameter of 233 nm. The dual-filler system demonstrated significantly enhanced mechanical properties, with a Young's modulus nearly double that of pure CS mats (881 MPa vs. 455 MPa), attributed to strong interfacial interactions. In vivo, the CS-PEO-HNT-CeONP scaffolds degraded more slowly, promoted earlier formation of a connective tissue capsule, and elicited a reduced inflammatory response compared to single-filler systems. Although epithelialization was temporarily delayed, the dual-filler composite ultimately facilitated superior tissue regeneration, characterized by a more organized, native-like collagen architecture. The synergistic combination of HNTs and CeONPs within a CS matrix yields a highly promising scaffold for wound management, offering a unique blend of tailored biodegradability, enhanced mechanical strength, and the ability to guide healing towards a regenerative rather than a fibrotic outcome, particularly for burns and traumatic injuries.

Indexed as

CeriumChitosanClayNanocompositesNanoparticlesNanotubesWound HealingAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsMaleMesenchymal Stem CellsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible Materialsceric oxideCeriumChitosanClaybiocompatibilitycerium oxide nanoparticleschitosanelectrospun scaffoldshalloysite nanotubeswound healing

Identifiers

PMID41226562
PMCPMC12611052

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.