Evidence mapPaperPMID 41226592Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

The Urinary Microbiota and the Gut-Bladder Axis in Bladder Cancer.

Usman Akhtar Butt, Daniela De Biase

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Usman Akhtar ButtDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Corso della Repubblica 79, 04100 Latina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6987-3393
Daniela De BiaseDepartment of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Corso della Repubblica 79, 04100 Latina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8118-9807

Funding

Sapienza University of Rome MA120172B88445A7Sapienza University of Rome RD12318AAABE3A08
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human bladder hosts a resident, low-biomass microbial community (urobiota) that has only become the subject of intense investigation in the last 15 years. The advantages that the urobiota may confer to the bladder, in contrast to the microbiota of other mucosal sites, remain to be elucidated. Alterations in the urobiota have been associated with various pathological urogenital conditions, including urinary tract infections (UTIs) and recurrent UTIs. A potential link between bladder cancer (BC), the ninth most common human cancer by incidence worldwide, and a dysbiotic urobiota is still unclear and represents an emerging field of study. In this review, we focus on recent studies that not only analyzed the urobiota of BC patients using urine specimens to identify biomarkers and microbial signatures of the disease, but also monitored therapeutic responses to therapies. We also discuss novel techniques of culturing, such as culturomics, animal models of BC, and 3D organotypic models. Furthermore, we review studies on the gut-bladder axis which, though still limited, already suggest that diet- and gut-derived bacterial metabolites can influence BC progression and individual responses to therapy.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaUrinary BladderUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAnimalsHumansUrinary Tract Infectionsbladder cancerbladder microbiotagut-bladder axismicrobial metabolites

Identifiers

PMID41226592
PMCPMC12610541

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.