ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2025
In Silico Identification of the NLRP3 Inhibitors from Traditional Chinese Medicine.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- In silico drug discovery and molecular dynamics simulation for targeting neonatal pneumonia and bronchopulmonary dysplasia.Frontiers in chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
NOD-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome is a key mediator of inflammation and a promising therapeutic target. However, the discovery of novel and effective inhibitors of NLRP3 remains limited. A combined docking-based virtual screening (DBVS) and shape-based screening approach was applied to eight traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) databases to identify potential NLRP3 inhibitors. Structural similarity analysis, ADMET prediction, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were performed to evaluate structural novelty, pharmacokinetic properties, and binding stability. A total of 25 potential NLRP3 inhibitors were identified, each exhibiting docking scores higher than those of the reference inhibitor XE3. Structural similarity analysis revealed that the screened compounds exhibited low similarity to previously reported NLRP3 inhibitors, demonstrating their structural novelty. ADMET evaluation indicated that compounds C2, C3, and C4 exhibited favorable physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations demonstrated that the complexes of compounds C2, C3, and C4 with NLRP3 remained stable throughout the simulations, exhibiting limited backbone fluctuations and compact conformations, as indicated by Rg values of approximately 6 Å. Solvent-accessible surface area (SASA) and polar surface area (PSA) analyses suggested that compounds C3 and C4 were tightly solvated and maintained favorable membrane permeability. Notably, binding free energy calculations revealed that all three compounds exhibited stronger binding than XE3, with compound C3 showing the most favorable energy (-48.81 ± 3.89 kcal/mol), indicating a highly stable and energetically preferred interaction with NLRP3. This study identified promising TCM-derived compounds as potential NLRP3 inhibitors, offering new directions for anti-inflammatory drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.