Evidence mapPaperPMID 41226611Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2025

Cross-Talk Between Neutrophils and Macrophages Post-Myocardial Infarction: From Inflammatory Drivers to Therapeutic Targets.

Letitia Ciortan, Razvan Daniel Macarie, Elena Barbu, Miruna Larisa Naie, Andreea Cristina Mihaila, Mihaela Serbanescu, Elena Butoi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Letitia CiortanInflammation Department, Institute of Cellular Biology and Pathology "Nicolae Simionescu", 050568 Bucharest, Romania.
Razvan Daniel MacarieInflammation Department, Institute of Cellular Biology and Pathology "Nicolae Simionescu", 050568 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-1957-3752
Elena BarbuDepartment of Cardiology, Elias Emergency University Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-9724-7143
Miruna Larisa NaieInflammation Department, Institute of Cellular Biology and Pathology "Nicolae Simionescu", 050568 Bucharest, Romania.
Andreea Cristina MihailaInflammation Department, Institute of Cellular Biology and Pathology "Nicolae Simionescu", 050568 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-4709-7124
Mihaela SerbanescuInflammation Department, Institute of Cellular Biology and Pathology "Nicolae Simionescu", 050568 Bucharest, Romania.
Elena ButoiInflammation Department, Institute of Cellular Biology and Pathology "Nicolae Simionescu", 050568 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-5748-5641

Funding

European Union - NextGenerationEU and the Romanian Government through the National Recovery and Resilience Plan, Component 9 - Investment 8, Romanian Academy 760063/23.05.2023, CF93/15.11.2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute myocardial infarction (MI) is a major cardiovascular event and a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Beyond the initial ischemic injury, the inflammatory and immune responses play pivotal roles in both tissue damage and subsequent healing. While the anti-inflammatory strategies targeting neutrophil-driven injury have demonstrated potential in limiting early cardiac damage, growing evidence highlights the critical role of innate immune cells beyond the acute phase. Neutrophils, traditionally associated with tissue injury, also contribute to the resolution of inflammation and initiate key repair processes. Monocytes and macrophages follow a dynamic trajectory, transitioning from pro-inflammatory to reparative states, and play essential roles in debris clearance, angiogenesis, and scar formation. In the early inflammatory phase of acute MI, immune cells such as neutrophils and monocytes are rapidly recruited and activated. While they initially amplify inflammation through the release of pro-inflammatory mediators, their subsequent transition toward anti-inflammatory and reparative phenotypes helps limit tissue damage by clearing necrotic debris from the infarcted area and contributes to the resolution of inflammation. Accumulating evidence reveals a complex crosstalk between neutrophils and macrophages post-MI, with resident macrophages being involved in neutrophil recruitment, and neutrophil-derived signals participating in monocyte recruitment and macrophage polarization, thereby coordinating the spatial and temporal phases of cardiac repair. Understanding how neutrophil-derived mediators influence macrophage responses and whether macrophage-secreted factors reciprocally modulate neutrophil behavior opens promising pathways for developing targeted therapies to limit adverse remodeling following MI. Therefore, this review aims to (i) provide an overview of the roles of neutrophils and monocytes/macrophages in the pathophysiology of myocardial infarction, (ii) explore the mechanisms of communication, particularly via neutrophil-derived secreted factors, that influence monocyte/macrophage function and impact post-MI inflammation, repair, and remodeling, and (iii) highlight the potential therapies interfering with inflammation and neutrophil/macrophage cross-talk.

Indexed as

Cell CommunicationInflammationMacrophagesMyocardial InfarctionNeutrophilsAnimalsHumansMonocytescross-talkinflammationmacrophagesmyocardial infarctionneutrophils

Identifiers

PMID41226611
PMCPMC12607372

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.