ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
New Horizons in Venous Thromboembolism Management: A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bridging practice and evidence: insights from the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine and Saudi Critical Care Society Guidelines on trauma-related VTE.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a major cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide, and is a staple of daily clinical practice. While we have seen significant advancements in therapeutics over the last 20 years, several questions and controversies remain in the selection and duration of available therapies, as well as balancing the consequences of VTE and the bleeding risk imposed by treatment modalities. In recent years, new evidence based on randomized trials and registries have reshaped the therapeutic landscape. This narrative review synthesizes the latest advancements and future directions in VTE care, including recent guideline updates, new evidence pertaining to established pharmacologic therapy, risk stratification, interventional and procedural options, and special populations including the management of cancer-associated thrombosis, and the emerging promise of factor XI inhibition. In diagnostics, the field is moving beyond traditional methods with the investigation of novel biomarkers from proteomic and metabolomic studies and the clinical implementation of advanced imaging modalities like photon-counting CT, which offers superior resolution at lower radiation doses. Artificial intelligence is emerging as a transformative tool, potentially enhancing diagnostic accuracy in imaging. Ultimately, this review will assist clinicians in integrating evolving evidence with patient-centered decision-making to maximize benefit while minimizing harm and treating the diverse and common clinical problems of VTE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.