ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Atrial Septal Defects: From Embryology to Pediatric Pulmonary Hypertension.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Maternal Blood as a Window to the Fetal Heart: Novel Biomarkers for Early Detection of Septal Defects.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Diagnostic performance of wearable acoustic-electrocardiographic indices for screening secundum atrial septal defect in children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial septal defect (ASD) is characterized by an abnormal opening between the left (LA) and right atria (RA). Even though it's one of the most prevalent congenital heart defects, there are still many knowledge gaps and clinical uncertainties. This review aims to create a complex description of ASD and discuss its link with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). An extensive literature search was conducted on sites such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect. This study reviews the key findings of peer-reviewed articles with the keywords ASD, PAH, and congenital heart defects. The research showed that whilst there are multiple reviews, there is still a need for a deeper understanding, especially in areas of embryology, decision thresholds for closure, and pediatric-specific long-term outcomes. Current guidelines often extrapolate data only from adults or avoid certain topics. Those ambiguities often lead to variable medical practices, missed opportunities, and uncertainty for families. This review is divided into clear sections, creating a step-by-step characterization of the most important information, which can be useful to specialists. It touches on important subjects and controversies. It shows a clear timeline, starting with embryology, genetics, and anatomy, through pathophysiology and patient description, ending with recommendations and indications for specific treatment methods. Moreover, it creates a clear connection between ASD and PAH, outlining its danger and the need for prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.