ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2025
Acute Pain Management at the Intersection of Primary and Secondary Care: Insights from Recent Literature.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute pain is a significant clinical challenge in primary and secondary care. If inadequately managed, acute pain is a major risk factor for the development of chronic postsurgical pain and persistent postoperative opioid use. In this perspective article, we offer the authors' viewpoints informed by selective literature with the aim of helping identify avenues to improve the quality and safety of acute pain management. Current evidence in the quality and safety of pain management shows that the role of primary care staff in education, follow-up, and tapering remains largely unaddressed, while patient perspectives and experiences reveal gaps in communication, stigma, and trust. Screening tools, guidelines, and strategies to reduce variations in the prescription and use of opioids remain inconsistently developed. In conclusion, if pain is multifaceted and should be approached in a multidisciplinary way, strong integration between primary and secondary care is essential. Communication with primary care, tapering, or referral should be facilitated. Patient experience should receive more attention, and future studies should focus on implementing guidelines and multidisciplinary guidance, as well as providing continuous feedback to clinicians on their practice and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.