ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2025
Alzheimer Syndrome or Age-Related Dementia-History, Therapy and Prevention.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This narrative review of Alzheimer's disease (AD) history, therapy and prevention shows that its conceptualization has changed three times over 100 years. First, AD was a normative creation by Kraepelin in 1910 of a rare presenile dementia characterized by specific histological features. Second, during the 1970s, American neurologists, driven by sociological changes, merged presenile and senile dementias into an Alzheimer-type dementia with the universally accepted clinicopathological diagnostic criteria of McKhann. By the end of the 20th century, AD was divided into early-onset genetic (1%) and late-onset sporadic (99%) forms. In the 21st century, AD was redefined as a biological entity, using biological and neuroimaging markers of amyloid, tau and neurodegeneration, to better address research and clinical trials. This new nosology has been widely criticized, given the absence of curative therapy, the evidence of mixed pathology in most cases and the decline in the dementia/AD incidence in high-income countries. However, there are currently many drugs against AD in the pipeline; prevention appears as medical and social therapy. In summary, the ancient concept of age-related dementia has evolved into AD normative disorders over 100 years. Nowadays, AD requires a conceptual reassessment, although its medical paradigm remains. Awaiting pharmacological breakthroughs, dementia prevention seems the best practical approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.