Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41227148›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2025

Alzheimer Syndrome or Age-Related Dementia-History, Therapy and Prevention.

Félix Bermejo-Pareja, Teodoro Del Ser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Félix Bermejo-ParejaConsortium for Biomedical Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases (CIBERNED), Institute of Health Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain.
Teodoro Del SerAlzheimer's Centre Reina Sofia-CIEN Foundation, Institute of Health Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9806-7083

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This narrative review of Alzheimer's disease (AD) history, therapy and prevention shows that its conceptualization has changed three times over 100 years. First, AD was a normative creation by Kraepelin in 1910 of a rare presenile dementia characterized by specific histological features. Second, during the 1970s, American neurologists, driven by sociological changes, merged presenile and senile dementias into an Alzheimer-type dementia with the universally accepted clinicopathological diagnostic criteria of McKhann. By the end of the 20th century, AD was divided into early-onset genetic (1%) and late-onset sporadic (99%) forms. In the 21st century, AD was redefined as a biological entity, using biological and neuroimaging markers of amyloid, tau and neurodegeneration, to better address research and clinical trials. This new nosology has been widely criticized, given the absence of curative therapy, the evidence of mixed pathology in most cases and the decline in the dementia/AD incidence in high-income countries. However, there are currently many drugs against AD in the pipeline; prevention appears as medical and social therapy. In summary, the ancient concept of age-related dementia has evolved into AD normative disorders over 100 years. Nowadays, AD requires a conceptual reassessment, although its medical paradigm remains. Awaiting pharmacological breakthroughs, dementia prevention seems the best practical approach.

Indexed as

age-related dementiaagingAlzheimer’s diseasehistoryneurodegenerative diseasesnosologypresenile-dementiasenile dementiasyndrome

Identifiers

PMID41227148
PMCPMC12607965

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.