Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41227213›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

Clinical, Radiological, and Endoscopic Features of Pancreatic Pseudocyst and Walled-Off Necrosis: How to Diagnose and How to Drain Them.

Giuseppe Dell'Anna, Salvatore Lavalle, Paolo Biamonte, Jacopo Fanizza, Edoardo Masiello, Angelo Bruni, Francesco Vito Mandarino, Paoletta Preatoni, Francesco Azzolini, Jahnvi Dhar and 12 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Giuseppe Dell'AnnaGastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9395-5468
Salvatore LavalleDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Enna Kore, 94100 Enna, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-5556-6259
Paolo BiamonteGastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Division, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Piazza Edmondo Malan 2, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Jacopo FanizzaGastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Edoardo MasielloFaculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 56, 20132 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0007-0810-409X
Angelo BruniGastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, University of Bologna, 40100 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0009-0002-0895-1225
Francesco Vito MandarinoGastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9931-7221
Paoletta PreatoniGastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6515-7960
Francesco AzzoliniGastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Jahnvi DharDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Punjab Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Mohal 160062, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6929-4276
Jayanta SamantaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Punjab Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, Mohal 160062, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9277-5086
Antonio FacciorussoFaculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salento, Piazza Tancredi 7, 73100 Lecce, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2107-2156
Elisa StasiFaculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salento, Piazza Tancredi 7, 73100 Lecce, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9919-2660
Mattia BrigidaFaculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salento, Piazza Tancredi 7, 73100 Lecce, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8507-855X
Armando Dell'AnnaFaculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salento, Piazza Tancredi 7, 73100 Lecce, Italy.
Marcello SpampinatoGeneral Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Piazza Filippo Muratore 1, 73100 Lecce, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4036-6819
Marcello MaidaDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, University of Enna Kore, 94100 Enna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4992-9289
Sara MassironiGastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3214-8192
Vito AnneseGastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Division, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Piazza Edmondo Malan 2, 20097 San Donato Milanese, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0082-892X
Lorenzo FuccioGastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, University of Bologna, 40100 Bologna, Italy.
Gianfranco DonatelliUnité d'Endoscopie Interventionnelle, Hôpital Privé des Peupliers, 75013 Paris, France.
Silvio DaneseGastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7341-1351

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs) and walled-off necrosis (WON) are two distinct sequelae of acute and chronic pancreatitis, requiring accurate differentiation to guide appropriate management. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remain essential for distinguishing PPs from WON, assessing their content, and identifying potential complications. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has emerged as a key modality for both diagnosis and drainage planning, offering high-resolution imaging and the possibility of real-time aspiration. Management strategies have evolved significantly, shifting from surgical to minimally invasive approaches. Endoscopic drainage, including EUS-guided transmural drainage with double-pigtail or lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS), has become the preferred strategy for symptomatic or infected collections. Endoscopic necrosectomy is increasingly performed for WON, providing a less invasive alternative to surgical debridement. However, patient selection and procedural techniques remain topics of ongoing debate. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive synthesis of current evidence regarding the diagnosis and management of pancreatic pseudocyst and walled-off necrosis. We will synthesize current evidence on diagnostic criteria, imaging modalities, and therapeutic algorithms for PPs and WON. We will discuss technical aspects, success rates, and complications associated with drainage modalities, comparing endoscopic, percutaneous, and surgical approaches. Special attention will be given to recent advancements in interventional endoscopy and their impact on patient outcomes. By integrating clinical insights with the latest literature, this review aims to provide an up-to-date reference for clinicians managing pancreatic fluid collections. A literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and MEDLINE databases to identify relevant studies on diagnostic criteria, imaging techniques, and management strategies.

Indexed as

computed tomography (CT)endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS)magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs)walled-off necrosis (WON)

Identifiers

PMID41227213
PMCPMC12608859

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.