ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Heart-Lung Interactions in Combined Distributive Shock and ARDS: Applied Cardiopulmonary Physiology at the Bedside.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Geometry of Circulatory Shock: A Conceptual Multi-Scale Lagrangian Framework for Physiology-Informed Hemodynamic Phenotyping.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Patient Self-Inflicted Lung Injury in ARDS: From Physiological Concept to Clinical Syndrome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Distributive shock and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are syndromes of profound pathophysiological complexity, each independently associated with high morbidity and mortality. When coexistent, they create a state of synergistic cardiopulmonary failure where conventional, protocolized management approaches are often insufficient. This review synthesizes current mechanistic insights into heart-lung interactions in distributive shock with ARDS, highlighting the central role of right ventricular-pulmonary arterial coupling and the dual impact of altered lung mechanics and vascular dysregulation. We examine the distinct hemodynamic implications of pulmonary versus extrapulmonary ARDS phenotypes, including their divergent effects on transpulmonary pressure, venous return, and right ventricular afterload, and emphasize the clinical relevance of mixed phenotypes. Advanced monitoring modalities-esophageal manometry, echocardiography, and, in select cases, pulmonary artery catheterization-are presented as essential tools for dynamic phenotyping and individualized titration of ventilatory and hemodynamic strategies. Building on these principles, we outline phenotype-directed approaches to ventilation, fluid and vasoactive therapy, and adjunctive interventions such as proning and extracorporeal support. Finally, we discuss knowledge gaps and future directions, underscoring the need for integrative technologies and phenotype-stratified trials to refine precision management. The nuanced integration of cardiopulmonary physiology into bedside decision-making represents a paradigm shift toward individualized, physiology-guided care for this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.