ReviewCells2025
Modelling Osteoporosis in Pre-Clinical Research-Challenges, Trends and New Approaches.
Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progress in Hydroxyapatite Nanocarriers for Targeted and Enhanced Osteoporosis Treatment: A Comprehensive Review.Molecular biotechnology · 2026Review
- Platelet-derived biomaterials in osteoporosis: mechanisms, evidence and translational prospects.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- Plants used in medicines and foods in osteoporosis: mechanistic insights into bone-remodeling homeostasis and clinical evidence.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Deer Antler Extract Promotes Osteoblast Differentiation and Improves Bone Microarchitecture in an Ovariectomy-Induced Osteoporosis Model.Preventive nutrition and food science · 2026Article
- Engineering osteoporosis-related bone organoids: a mechanism-module-functional readout framework for disease modelling and biomarker translation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Sea buckthorn berry extract favorably affects bone metabolism-related biomarkers and collagen deposition in cultured rat primary osteoblasts.Open life sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a bone disease characterized by low bone mass and changes in bone architecture, often leading to fractures and thereby decreased functional status in affected patients. About 200 million people worldwide suffer from osteoporosis, with women being affected earlier in life and more often than men. Various factors, such as genetic background, comorbidities, alcohol abuse, and medications such as glucocorticoids, are known to contribute to the development of osteoporosis. Due to the changing demographics, osteoporosis is becoming increasingly prevalent, and with this, the rate of fractures is expected to increase in the coming years. To investigate therapeutic options for treatment and to elucidate disease-causing mechanisms, various in vivo and in vitro osteoporosis models have been developed. In vivo models, in particular small animal models, remain the gold standard for osteoporosis research and the most used model to illustrate osteoporosis is the ovariectomized mouse. While in vivo models largely reflect the systemic and biological conditions, the transferability of findings to human patients is low and ethical concerns for laboratory animals must be considered. Thanks to tremendous technological improvements, such as on-a-chip platforms and high-end bioreactor systems, sophisticated in vitro models are of growing interest. These models offer the possibility of using complex cell systems, human cells from single donors, and 3D models, thus bridging the transferability gap, providing a platform for the introduction of personalized precision medicine, and ultimately replacing animal testing. Here, we summarize and discuss recent in vivo, in vitro, and in silico osteoporosis research approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.