ReviewCells2025
Cells Versus Cell-Derived Signals in Cardiac Regenerative Therapy: A Comparative Analysis of Mechanisms and Clinical Evidence.
Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stem Cells and Their Derivatives in Cardiac Fibrosis Therapy: Challenges and Perspectives.Cells · 2026Review
- The Phoenix Heart-PICSO and the Rebirth of Embryonic Life in the Ischemic Myocardium.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Bioengineered Cellular and Acellular Therapies for Ischemic Heart Disease in Clinically Relevant Models.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Regenerative and molecular therapies for myocardial repair (Review).Medicine internationalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) and other cardiac pathologies represent leading causes of hospitalization and mortality worldwide, underscoring the urgent need for effective regenerative therapies. In recent years, considerable research has focused on developing cell-based therapeutic strategies, with stem cells receiving particular attention. Approaches that harness cellular signaling pathways have also been investigated. Experimental studies conducted in both animal models and human subjects have demonstrated that cell-based therapies hold remarkable potential, showing efficacy through improvements in cardiac function, patient quality of life, and overall safety. Clinical data concerning therapies based on cellular signals, while sometimes inconclusive, often yield outcomes comparable to or even superior to those of cell-based interventions. Nonetheless, both approaches face substantial challenges, including the need to ensure reproducibility of results, standardization of therapeutic product preparation, and addressing ethical and regulatory considerations. To translate these promising strategies into clinical practice, a greater number of large-scale, multicenter, and diverse clinical trials will be required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.