ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Effect of Sample Thickness and Post-Processing on Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Titanium Alloy.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanical and biological properties of 3D printed bionic porous Gyroid structure implant.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
- Optimisation of 3D Printing Parameters and Surface Modification for Porous Gyroid Structures in Beta Titanium Alloy Ti25Nb4Ta8Sn.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
3D printing of beta titanium alloys for biomedical applications is currently in great demand, both for material reasons and for the possibility of producing very complex replacements, often directly tailored to the patient. Gyroidal and similar structures are ideal for biomedical replacements but their manufacturing require specific additive technology and post-processing like annealing or etching. The aim of this work is to determine the mechanical properties of Ti25Nb4Ta8Sn alloy which overcomes Ti6Al4V in biomedical applications. The results showed that Ti6Al4V exhibited a significantly higher ultimate tensile strength (up to 1200 MPa) compared with the beta titanium alloy Ti25Nb4Ta8Sn (up to 360 MPa), while the latter demonstrated a substantially lower elastic modulus (∼40-50 GPa), beneficial for biomedical applications. Annealing improved strength and reduced internal stresses in both alloys, while etching effectively removed residual powder but slightly decreased mechanical integrity. These findings provide a quantitative basis for optimizing printing and post-processing parameters of beta titanium alloys for implant design. The properties will be used for future numerical simulations of implants made from Ti25Nb4Ta8Sn alloy based on discrete particle grid models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.