ReviewCancers2025
The Role of
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The oral microbiota in oral squamous cell carcinoma: unravelling mechanisms and clinical potential.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- The Silent Link: Exploring the Impact of Periodontal Diseases on Head and Neck Carcinogenesis.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2026Review
- Early modulatory effects of Porphyromonas gingivalis and Lactobacillus salivarius on oncogenic processes in dysplastic oral keratinocytes.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most common type of head and neck malignancy worldwide. Despite the prevalence of modern diagnostic and prognostic techniques, late diagnosis and resistance to treatment still result in a low 5-year survival rate, high recurrence rate, and frequent malignant metastases. Increasing evidence indicates that bacteria of the oral microbiome, such as the Gram-negative anaerobic
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.