ReviewCancers2025
Blood-Based Surveillance Biomarkers for Gastroesophageal Cancers.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liquid Biopsy for Molecular Residual Disease Detection and Postoperative Surveillance in Gastric Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- An inertial-acoustofluidic platform for bioanalysis: concurrent, high-precision, high-throughput separation of cells and bacteria.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastroesophageal cancers including esophageal and gastric cancer remain major causes of global cancer mortality, primarily due to late diagnosis and high recurrence rates after curative treatment. Current surveillance methods, such as endoscopy and imaging, are invasive, costly, and often inadequate for detection. Blood-based biomarkers ("liquid biopsies") offer a minimally invasive alternative capable of real-time tumor monitoring. In this review, we summarize recent advances across all major classes of blood-derived biomarkers: circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), methylated DNA, cell-free RNAs (microRNAs, lncRNAs, circRNAs), circulating proteins, autoantibodies, circulating tumor cells, extracellular vesicles, and metabolites. Reviewing the existing literature on gastroesophageal cancers, we highlight current evidence, validation phases, performance metrics, and limitations. Special attention is given to clinical trial evidence, including ctDNA monitoring studies, that demonstrated earlier recurrence detection compared to imaging. While blood-based biomarker analysis has not yet supplanted endoscopy as standard of care in gastroesophageal cancer surveillance, the convergence of multi-analyte assays, AI, and clinical validation trials positions liquid biopsy as a transformative tool in the surveillance of gastroesophageal cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.